Public Comments

---

Comment #22

Published 5 Feb 2025

Sentiment towards this application

Objection

Comment

* Comment on the design, size or height of new buildings or extensions: This appears a poor application and lacks clear dimensions and also does not really show how it will affect neighbouring properties in the visualisations given. However it is clear the scale is disproportionate to others, including neighbouring properties, which will tend to reduce the charm of the mews....

Comment #21

Published 5 Feb 2025

Sentiment towards this application

Objection

Comment

* Comment on the design, size or height of new buildings or extensions: Over the past twenty years changes in scale have occurred to properties in Murray Mews. Modest Mews homes have been allowed to become quite substantive (now expensive) houses. Several years ago numbers 40 and 45 underwent development, and a further floor was added to each. This did to some degree dwarf adjacent houses. The precedent was then set, and further ‘scaling-up’ has at intervals along the Mews occurred....

Comment #19

Published 29 Jan 2025

Sentiment towards this application

Objection

Comment

* Comment on the design, size or height of new buildings or extensions: It is noticeable that no dimensions are provided with this application. However it is possible to calculate these from the scale provided. From this I work out that this application would like to increase the size of the area of the top floor from 31.5 Sq M to 48.15 Sq M - an increase of 53%....

Comment #18

Published 26 Jan 2025

Sentiment towards this application

Objection

Comment

* Comment on the design, size or height of new buildings or extensions: [Note: This comment contains some minor wording corrections to our previous comment] We would like to register our opposition to application 25-00114-HAPP, since it is not in keeping with the area’s Appraisal and Management Strategy and will strongly impact the light and compromise the design of #47 Murray Mews’s terrace....

Comment #17

Published 26 Jan 2025

Sentiment towards this application

Objection

Comment

* Comment on the design, size or height of new buildings or extensions: We would like to register our opposition to application 25-00114-HAPP, since it is not in keeping with the area’s Appraisal and Management Strategy and will strongly impact the light and compromise the design of #47 Murray Mews’s terrace. The proposal does not respect the general nature, nor continue the rhythm of, or adhere to the pattern of the Murray Mews Extensions....

Comment #16

Published 22 Jan 2025

Sentiment towards this application

Objection

Comment

* Other comments: The building is not suited for a person with disabilities as myself.