Skip to main content

BetaThis is a new service. Help us improve it and give your feedback (opens in new tab).

Back

45, MURRAY MEWS, LONDON, NW1 9RH

Application Reference

25-00114-HAPP

Public Comments

Search comments

Comment #22

Published

Sentiment towards this application

Objection

Other
* Comment on the design, size or height of new buildings or extensions: This appears a poor application and lacks clear dimensions and also does not really show how it will affect neighbouring properties in the visualisations given. However it is clear the scale is disproportionate to others, including neighbouring properties, which will tend to reduce the charm of the mews. * Comment on any impacts on natural light: The very large size of this proposed development will have a significant…
Read the rest of this comment

Comment #21

Published

Sentiment towards this application

Objection

Other
* Comment on the design, size or height of new buildings or extensions: Over the past twenty years changes in scale have occurred to properties in Murray Mews. Modest Mews homes have been allowed to become quite substantive (now expensive) houses. Several years ago numbers 40 and 45 underwent development, and a further floor was added to each. This did to some degree dwarf adjacent houses. The precedent was then set, and further ‘scaling-up’ has at intervals along the Mews occurred. At number 41…
Read the rest of this comment

Comment #19

Published

Sentiment towards this application

Objection

Other
* Comment on the design, size or height of new buildings or extensions: It is noticeable that no dimensions are provided with this application. However it is possible to calculate these from the scale provided. From this I work out that this application would like to increase the size of the area of the top floor from 31.5 Sq M to 48.15 Sq M - an increase of 53%. This would be a massive increase in the bulk, visibility and intrusiveness of the top floor of No 45 Murray Mews, onto it's neighb…
Read the rest of this comment

Comment #18

Published

Sentiment towards this application

Objection

Other
* Comment on the design, size or height of new buildings or extensions: [Note: This comment contains some minor wording corrections to our previous comment] We would like to register our opposition to application 25-00114-HAPP, since it is not in keeping with the area’s Appraisal and Management Strategy and will strongly impact the light and compromise the design of #47 Murray Mews’s terrace. The proposal does not respect the general nature, nor continue the rhythm of, or adhere to the …
Read the rest of this comment

Comment #17

Published

Sentiment towards this application

Objection

Other
* Comment on the design, size or height of new buildings or extensions: We would like to register our opposition to application 25-00114-HAPP, since it is not in keeping with the area’s Appraisal and Management Strategy and will strongly impact the light and compromise the design of #47 Murray Mews’s terrace. The proposal does not respect the general nature, nor continue the rhythm of, or adhere to the pattern of the Murray Mews Extensions. In the Appraisal and Management Strategy for thi…
Read the rest of this comment

Comment #16

Published

Sentiment towards this application

Objection

Other
* Other comments: The building is not suited for a person with disabilities as myself. * Comment on the use and function of the proposed development: No lift in the building * Comment on disabled access: No lift * Comment on any impacts on natural light: The trees need to be cut * Comment on any impacts on privacy of neighbours: Ok